JOIN EHA

DONATE

Published by EH.NET (July 1, 2000)

David Eltis, The Rise of African Slavery in the Americas, Cambridge,

Cambridge University Press, 2000. xvii + 353 pp., $59.95 (cloth), ISBN:

0-521-65231-6.

Reviewed for EH.NET by Jan Hogendorn, Department of Economics, Colby College.

David Eltis of Queen’s University, Canada, has produced an ambitious

explanatory survey on the emergence of African slavery in the Americas. Why, he

asks, should a slave system have arisen in the New World under western European

auspices when the countries involved were in so many other ways leaders in

developing political and economic freedoms?

Eltis explores the issue in a lengthy, densely-written volume that serves to

highlight three decades of advance in the study of American slavery and the

Atlantic slave trade, an intellectual progress in which he has been a major

player. A significant innovation in this book is the way it integrates analyses

of labor and commodity markets in Africa, Europe, and the Americas with

transport costs to arrive at conclusions based broadly on demand and supply.

Any attempt to achieve such breadth is a daunting task with the danger that the

thread of the argument will be lost, but Eltis has succeeded in making his

story plausible and coherent — though not an easy read.

The first analytical chapter (Chapter 2) undertakes to show the relationship

between the rise of the Atlantic slave trade and the development of a free

labor market and modern labor force in Europe. Here the focus is on how the

competing demands for labor on both sides of the Atlantic together with

improvement in the position of labor in Europe put limits on the labor supply

in the Americas, giving the necessary opening for African slavery to emerge in

that area.

In Chapter 3, “Europeans and African Slavery in the Americas,” Eltis turns to

the question of why European slaves were not an adequate substitute for

Africans in bondage. He notes that military captives and criminals were

available in quantity and reminds us (in interesting detail) of the long

tradition of galley slaves at the oars of Mediterranean shipping. But in this

case the implicit debate on who was eligible for slavery, who an insider and

who an outsider, the balance went against the use of European slaves — a

decision made the easier by the availability of African slaves. He continues

the analysis into issues of gender, probing why women were far more important

in the African slave trade than they were among other migrant flows of labor

indentured and free. The position of European women in the eyes of the

Europeans themselves was a cultural norm that kept them from plantation gang

labor but such norms did not protect African women.

These basically cultural explanations become more explicitly economic in

Chapter 5, on productivity in the slave trade. In his treatment Eltis

emphasizes the role of transport costs. The focus is apt because as he points

out the high cost of organization, financing, shipping, handling, and insurance

together with the long delays often experienced in trading on the African

coasts raised the price of both imports of goods to Africa and slaves exported

from that continent to about double their respective prices at the source. The

slave trade was “possibly the most international activity of the pre-industrial

era” (p. 136), with huge transport bills for the assembly of the goods shipped

from Europe and Asia (with textiles from India a major method of paying for

slaves), for transporting these goods to Africa, and then for the movement of

slaves to the New World.

At about the halfway point of the book, the focus shifts to Africa and the

supply side. The first question of Chapter 6 is why European enterprise

resulted in a movement of labor to the Americas when the same commodities could

have been produced by Europeans in Africa itself. An interesting review of

European attempts to establish farms and plantations on or near the African

coast leads to analysis of technical and ecological constraints but concludes

that the main barriers were political and military, with Europeans generally

unable at this stage to penetrate any significant distance inland from their

ships’ guns. So with commodity production in Africa foreclosed but possible

across the Atlantic, the most profitable alternative was to deal with African

suppliers of slaves. The establishment of these contacts and their

productivity-enhancing improvement concludes this chapter. An absorbing thread

of this discussion and that of the following chapter, “The African Impact on

the Transatlantic Slave Trade,” is how the trans-Atlantic shippers had to

confront resistance by slaves who, particularly at or near the coast, often

attempted to seize their floating prisons and escape. Eltis concludes that in

spite of the many productivity-increasing improvements in transport, one

economic fact of life was that costs of policing this risk were much higher

than otherwise. The main impact was on labor costs, where, he estimates,

outlays were higher by about two-thirds compared to a situation where policing

was not necessary. The effect of these higher costs was to reduce the quantity

of slaves exported by nearly ten percent, or about half a million people,

between 1700 and 1800, but as he notes, the extent of such resistance was very

different from one coastal location to another.

Another feature of the chapter on the “African Impact” is the description of

the complicated task facing European shippers of wares that had to be tailored

to the variegated demand patterns along the coast. The differences in demand

were striking, certainly not indicative of homogenized tastes. For example, in

1662-1703 according to Royal African Company records, imports of textiles to

the Bight of Biafra were 1 percent of all RAC shipments compared to 77 percent

along the Gold Coast; while for the same two areas metals were respectively 80

percent and 6 percent of total shipments. Almost all of the RAC’s cowries went

to the Slave Coast, with few arriving at any other destination. By commodity,

rarely did the average percentage share for the coast as a whole reflect the

percentage for any single one of the five regions shown in the data.

The volume concludes with chapters providing a comparative perspective on the

English plantations in America, on ethnicity in the trade, on the ultimate

impact of the trade on Europe, and with three appendices (on age and sex of the

Africans shipped to American bondage, on slave prices, and on the merchandise

imports to West Africa that served to purchase slaves).

Overall, Eltis’s impressive book does good work in two different arenas.

Specialists in research on the Atlantic slave trade and slavery in Africa and

the Americas will see better than before the integration among markets and

regions that characterized this trade. Economists and historians who are not

specialists will see this as well, but they will also find the book a

proficient and well-sourced overview of a massive subject.

Jan Hogendorn is the Grossman Professor of Economics at Colby College and the

author (with Paul Lovejoy) of Slow Death for Slavery: The Course of

Abolition in Northern Nigeria, 1897-1936, Cambridge University Press 1993.