Author(s): | Booth, Anne |
---|---|
Reviewer(s): | Touwen, Jeroen |
EH-NET BOOK REVIEW
Published by EH.NET (October 1998)
Anne Booth, The Indonesian Economy in the Nineteenth and Twentieth
Centuries: A History of Missed Opportunities. Basingstoke: Macmillan
and New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998. xvi + 377 pp. Includes
bibliographical references and index. $19.95 (paperback), ISBN
0-333-55310-1 (Macmillan). $79.95 (hardcover), ISBN 0-333-55309-8
(Macmillan) and 0-312-17749-6 (St. Martin’s Press)
Reviewed for EH-NET by Jeroen Touwen, Historical Institute, Leiden
University, The Netherlands.
BAD LUCK IN A VERY RESOURCEFUL ECONOMY
Which Lessons Can Indonesia Learn from its Past?
This is a volume in a new and ambitious series named A Modern Economic
History of Southeast Asia, edited by Anthony Reid, Anne Booth, Malcom
Falkus and Graeme Snooks, initiated by the Australian National University
in Canberra, and published by Macmillan. Of the eighteen volumes
planned (dealing either with themes or with countries), three have be
en published so far, of which this is one.
Professor Anne Booth of the School of Oriental and Asian Studies (SOAS) in
London has a long experience in the scholarship of the Indonesian economy.
She is known for her monograph Agricultural Development in Indonesia
(Sydney: Allen and Unwin, 1988) and for two influential edited volumes: A.
Booth, W.J. O’Malley and A. Weidemann (eds), Indonesian Economic History
in the Dutch Colonial Era, (New Haven: Yale Center for International Area
Studies, 1990), which is generally regarded as the first survey of modern
economic history of Indonesia), and A. Booth (ed.) The Oil Boom and After;
Indonesian Economic Policy and Performance in the Suharto Era
(Singapore: Oxford University Press, 1992). In addition, she ha
s published a long list of contributions in journals and edited volumes. In her
work,
she has consistently applied systematic quantitative macroeconomic
analysis in combination with a more qualitative evaluation of government
policy and growth theory. But what is also quite significant in her work
(including the present book under review) is her attention for a
combination of the colonial and the independent eras of Indonesian
history. Booth is one of the few historians who easily jumps back and
forth between these two periods, drawing parallels and making comparisons.
Thus, she is able to conceive a long-term view on economic development,
an approach which has often been ignored by economists and historians.
At first sight, the reader of The Indonesian Economy in the Nineteenth and
Twentieth Centuries is confronted with a provocative subtitle: A
History
of Missed Opportunities . To this subtitle a streak of irony is added by
the picture on the cover of the book: a photograph of the Indonesian
government aeroplane factory in Bandung. The Indonesian airplane industry
IPTN (Industri Pesawat Terbang Nasional), in which present-day president
Habibie played a leading role, has often been viewed as a symbol of
irresponsibly large expenditure on prestigious high-tech projects,
significant for the 1980s and 1990s Suharto-era. Does Booth criticize such
projects and imply that the Indonesian economy would have been better off
with investments in different sectors, or a different (more balanced)
economic policy? And which other opportunities have been missed by
Indonesia? Indonesia is one of the poorest countries of Southeast Asia and
has been lagging behind several of its neighbors for many decades. Only
during the recent period of export-oriented growth (ca. 1980-1997) did it
began receiving international praise for its economic performance – praise
that has melted away since the monetary crisis (and subsequent political
unrest) brought the Indonesian economy to a virtual stand-still and scared
off most foreign investors.
In the following, I will first review the contents of the book and outline
some of its characteristics. In conclusion, I will return to the question
of which opportunities were missed and how this affected Indonesian economic
development.
An extensive introduction (Chapter 1) describes the formation of an
‘Indonesian’ economy, highlights the current debates in the historiography,
and states the aims of the book, which consists of six chapters (excluding
the introduction and conclusion) dealing with thematic aspects of the
Indonesian economy.
Chapter 2 is called ‘Output Growth and Structural Change between
1820-1990′, and places the important political events in a chronological
survey of economic performance. This chapter has an essential function
in providing a chronological framework and evaluating the different
indicators and measurements of long-term economic development. Within
each sub-period, the trends in output growth are linked to changes in
domestic economic policies (reflecting changes in political priorities) and
to world market trends (p. 16). Particularly the phases of growth (p. 15,
85-87) should be mentioned here. In combining political events and
economic situation, Booth identifies the following 10 phases:
- 1) 1830-1870 rapid export growth, slowing down after 1840
- 2) 1870-1900 policy reforms but sluggish growth
- 3) 1900-1930 ethical policy and export expansion
- 4) 1930-1942 world depression leading to contraction of export volume
- 5) 1942-1950 Japanese occupation and independence struggle (harming
economic performance)
- 6) 1950-1958 rehabilitation of the economy, output growth
- 7) 1958-1966 declining per capita GDP, structural retrogression
- 8) 1966-1973 economic recovery
- 9) 1973-1981 the oil boom period
- 10) 1981-1990 non-oil exports production leading to output growth
economic performance)
Chapter 3 is called ‘Living Standards and Distribution of Income’ and sets
out to investigate why the relative rapid growth of GDP, almost certainly
faster than population for much of the last two centuries, did not result
in broadly based improvement in living standards. Booth argues that,
in fact, we should examine the growth of the part of GDP that is devoted
to household consumption, after subtracting government expenditures
and expenditures on capital formation, of which the returns are not
shared by all classes of society. Of course, also foreign remittances
should be disregarded in this context. The chapter argues that ‘the
growing expenditure on both government consumption and capital
formation, together with the high level of remittances abroad, meant
that, for much of the colonial era, private consumption expenditures
grew less rapidly on average than GDP’. Booth continues: ‘But, in
addition, there is evidence that such growth as occurred in average
consumption expenditures did not benefit all classes of society
equally. There were gainers and losers, and the gainers were often
concentrated in particular ethnic groups and regional locations’ (p. 89).
This development is typical for both the colonial and the independent
period, and also forms an essential element of today’s problems in
Indonesia. To quote Booth again: ‘As in other colonial societies, economic
stratification along ethnic lines was pronounced in Indonesia in the early
twentieth century, and in spite of the egalitarian rhetoric of the
independence struggle, this stratification persisted in the post-1950
period. The growth which has occurred since the 1950s has in turn produced
new patterns of differentiation by ethnic group, social class and region’
(p. 89).
In Chapter 4, ‘Government and the Economy in Indonesia in the Nineteenth
and Twentieth Centuries’, the economic role of the government in Indonesia
is studied. Conforming to the central argument of the book (which can be
rephrased as: to develop a long-term view on economic development and
economic policy in Indonesia), it is argued that for a deeper understanding
of Indonesian economic performance, we must also develop a better
understanding of the domestic factors which promoted or inhibited economic
growth. The actions of the successive governments, in both the colonial
and the post-colonial periods, are crucial in such an understanding (p. 135).
Strangely, a different set of phases is applied in this chapter (p. 137),
distinguishing six phases in the role of government which almost, but not
completely, cover (combinations of) the ten phases of growth distinguished
in Chapter 2 (p. 85-87). Although the six phases make sense and clearly
order the main policy tendencies, some more explicit comment could have
been made on their coinciding or not coinciding with phases of economic
growth (linking the effects of government intervention to the world
economic situation). I must add that in the further elaboration on the
individual phases, the context of economic performance is of course
often included, since government policy is usually designed in reaction to
economic conditions.
It is emphasized that ‘colonial Indonesia, at least in the twentieth
century, was far more than just a nightwatchman state, concerned purely
with law and order and the collection of taxes’ (p. 155). There was a
lot of reform and general enthusiasm for modernization, as
characterized by the Ethical Policy but also by the large number of
projects that were constructed in the physical infrastructure. This is
reflected in the large share of government in GDP. It is remarkable that
in the early independent period, from 1950 to 1965, real growth in public
expenditure was much lower than in the first three decades of the twentieth
century. Increase of the share of public expenditure relative to GDP
occurred not earlier than the latter part of the 1970s (p. 201).
Chapter 5 is entitled ‘The Impact of International Trade’, and deals with
the (important) role of trade in the Indonesian economy, the terms of
trade, the changes in the trade regime (“Rise and decline of free trade
liberalism in the colonial era”), the regulated trade regime since 1950,
and the post-colonial experience in trade. On the whole, Booth’s view
on the “colonial drain” seems to be pessimistic. This is obvious from
her evaluation of the oil boom period (1973-1981), where Booth writes:
‘Certainly, there is plenty of evidence that government investment over the
oil boom years was far from optimal. But at least the rents were retained
in the domestic economy. Had budgetary policy been used for investment
in human and physical capital at earlier periods in Indonesia’s economic
history, per capita output and living standards could have gr
own faster than in fact was the case’ (p. 243).
Further elaborating on the record of investment in the colonial economy,
Chapter 6 treats ‘Investment and Technological Change’, while Chapter 7
focuses on ‘Markets and Entrepreneurs’. The latter chapter
deals with the indigenous sector of the colonial economy, the development of
the labor
market, and the economic role of the Chinese, but also evaluates the role
of socialism and government planning in the period 1950-1965, and the
role of the state and the market during the New Order. This chapter
particularly should attract the attention of economists who will plan the
economic course of Indonesia after 2000. These themes clearly connect with
the problems of present-day Indonesia, concerning the powerful
conglomerates and the ethnic division of affluence. Booth explicitly states
that the rise of powerful conglomerates who were able to exploit political
connections preceded the deregulation and liberalization if the economy
over the 1980s. The rise of these conglomerates was a symptom of the
limitations of the deregulation process and not, as is sometimes argued,
a consequence of this process (p. 322).
A text book for advanced learners and a challenging monograph
As a textbook, this study has an interpretative character. In each chapter,
individual data and events are treated in the context of the theme of the
chapter. For example, if I want to know something about the Sugar Law of
1870, the index refers to pages 30 and 253. On page 30, the S
ugar Law is mentioned in the context of structural change in the economy.
Together with
the so-called Agrarian Law, the Sugar Law signaled the demise of the
Cultivation System in Java, but some scholars have argued that this
legislation did not produce a dramatic change in Java’s economy (it did
not form a watershed), even though it had an impact on export growth over
the longer term. On page 253 the Sugar Law is mentioned in the context of
investment and technological change, since it allowed for private
investment in the sugar sector, permitting free contracts between sugar
refineries and peasant cultivators, which allowed the government to
withdraw from the sugar cultivation (because the high failure rate of sugar
companies had caused the government substantial losses). The Agrarian
Law, closely connected with the Sugar Law, is also mentioned on page
298 in the context of land shortage in Java. There is no introductory
explanation in a chronological context of what the Sugar Law and the
Agrarian Law actually stated or implied.
This example shows that the book is not so much a beginners’ textbook, but
rather an interpretative study based on an exhaustive survey of the recent
literature and extensive analysis of quantitative data. In an elegant andc
ompact style, Booth manages to inform the reader continuously of the
debates on issues mentioned, on the various views held in the
historiography, or the need for further exploration on some themes. Of
course, as a macro-economist, she relies heavily on the (rich) Dutch
colonial source data for the colonial period (since there are no other
quantitative data for the colonial period). But by studying the long-term
development of a first colonized, then independent country, she avoids
placing too much emphasis on the colonizer’s presence and manages to
analyze the economy as such, integrating the domestic or indigenous
economy and the internationally oriented ‘predatory’ economy, and
developing a fairly ‘autonomous’ (non-eurocentric) view.
One criticism that could be made is that the thematic, non-chronological
structure of the contents of this book may not be very helpful in a survey
that covers two centuries. The various chapters, in their dealing with
structural change, distribution of income, government policy, the role of
international trade, investment, and entrepreneurship, each attempt to
cover the entire period 1800-1990. An introductory scholar will
continuously feel the need to browse back and forth, in order to piece
together a complete picture of each historical sub-period. On the other
hand, one may argue, this organisational structure allows for reading
one chapter at a time and puts an explicit emphasis on the long-term
continuity within each aspect of Indonesian history. This is indeed one of the
aims of the book. For example, Booth states that she wants to
‘highlight the underlying continuities in policy-making and the
implications of these continuities for Indonesian economic
development in the longer term’ (p. 12). She also argues that ‘
there were, and continue to be, more similarities in the economic goals of the
Dutch colonialists and the Indonesian nationalists than has yet been
acknowledged. These similarities are due to the persistence of many
underlying problems’ (p. 12). Thus, a thematic organization of the
contents of the book forces the reader to observe chronological
continuities within each theme. This is indeed one of the strong
arguments of the book.
Applying a long-term perspective, Booth distinguishes clearly between thep
eriods of expansion and stagnation. It is very instructive that these are
placed in the context of government economic policy and the world economic
situation. In an accessible style, she provides a balanced picture of
growth and decline, giving thoughtfully phrased judgements in matters
which have raised a lot of discussion. On the whole she meticulously
reviews and quotes the recent historiography, including many Indonesian
scholars.
Missed chances?
Now, which are the missed opportunities referred to in the title? Such
counterfactual meditation is, of course, a hazardous exercise, but it may
be able to throw light on the long-term lessons that can be drawn from
the past two centuries. As Booth says, it is ‘useful to ask if a different
type of colonialism could have produced better economic results’
(p. 329-330).
First, one can think of the effects of the Cultivation System, which
thwarted the development of market institutions in rural Java (p. 334), and
on the whole was merely oriented towards remitting a large annual sum to
the Dutch budget (p. 327).
Secondly, the late colonial Dutch regime was busy ‘developing’ the colony
in the material sense, but it largely ignored the need for higher education
or developing a skilled Indonesian work force. The colonizers constructed
a lot of infrastructure and social overhead capital. But the economic gains
from these efforts were largely lost after independence, mainly because
the educational system had failed to train a higher or middle class of
officials who could take over the economy after independence. Booth even
states that the ‘failure to accelerate access to education was probably the
greatest of sins of omission of Dutch colonialism’ (p. 328).
To perceive this as a missed chance for the Indonesian economy is feasible
from the point of view of the Indonesian society itself, which was hindered
by this imbalance. But it makes little sense when analyzing colonial
policy: the Dutch simply did not plan to leave very soon, and therefore did not
integrate the formation of an indigenous elite into their official
policies. Of course, the colonizer can always be blamed for colonizing
the country, but should it also be blamed for consistency within its own
system? I think it is more important that there was a system of ethnic
inequality or racial prejudice at the core of this Dutch colonial
consistency. It is this legacy of colonial rule which certainly can be
viewed as a “missed chance,” because it shows us, amongst others,
the roots of the strong economic position of Chinese entrepreneurs,
and the relatively weak indigenous entrepreneurial class. It also, in
part, explains the discontinuity in economic development after
independence. Booth draws attention to these matters and points at
the crucial fact that the Indonesian nationalist leaders were essentially
isolated from the economy or from specific economic ideas of how
to rule the country: ‘the weakness of the indigenous business
class in the late colonial era, together with the very small numbers of
indigenous Indonesians in the upper echelons of the administrative
service, or in the professions, meant that these groups had far less
influence on the leaders of the independence struggle than in, for
example, British India.’ (p. 330).
These reflections show that the historiography has progressed from making
simple-minded or emotional accusations to the colonial regime, and now
attempts to adopt a more objective perspective which allows for lessons to
be drawn. There have been many crossroads at which another direction could
have been taken, leading to different outcomes of economic development.
Needless to say that there were also favourable effects of certain
important events of Indonesia’s past.
Do the parallels drawn between Suharto’s new order and the late colonial
government policies also imply the suggestion that other roads could and
should have been taken by post-independence governments, or in other words
opportunities were missed? In Chapter 4, we find a positive evaluation oft
he progress made by the Suharto government during 1983-1990, making the
non-oil sectors (agriculture, manufacturing, tourism) more internationally
competitive and the economy less reliant on the exports of oil and gas
(p. 199). At the same time, it is stressed that the role of the government
in the economy was not in any way significantly reduced in the 1980s,
and that very little attempt was made to privatise the state-owned
enterprises, which had a very low rate of return. ‘Regulatory control over
parts of the state-owned enterprise sector remains weak: the so-called
“strategic enterprises,” controlled by the influential Minister of
Research, Dr. Habibie, enjoy access to extra-budgetory sources of
finance which are outside the control of the Ministry of
Finance, or any other government regulatory agency …. This recurrence of the
“Pertamina syndrome” indicates that the problem of controlling the state
enterprise sector is far from resolved in New Order Indonesia’
(pp. 200-201). Recalling the airplane factory on the cover, probably
Booth does view the Suharto/Habibie emphasis on prestigious,
high-tech state enterprises such as an airplane industry as a missed
chance. . .
As already mentioned, Booth is fairly positive about the investments of the
government using the oil boom rents, at the same time warning that the
economic reforms of the 1980s did not recreate the type of open trading
regime that prevailed in the colonial economy from the 1870s to the early
1930s (p. 242). She also states that investment in education and human
capital has, as it was in colonial times, in fact been neglected by the
Indonesian government since 1950.
In the last pages of Chapter 8, ‘Conclusions’, Booth describes the role and
the shape of the type of “market capitalism” that is encountered in
Indonesia (p. 334-336). Without referring to slogan type phrases such as
‘Asian values,’ she explains why free market capitalism is looked at with
ambivalence in Indonesia. This deep ambivalence about liberal market
capitalism persists in contemporary Indonesia at many different levels of
society and this ambivalence has not exactly strengthened Indonesia’s
economic performance. In part, the hesitation to accept free market
capitalism is rooted in nationalist, anti-imperialist views of the
pernicious colonial past. (This might have been different had the Dutch not
been in Indonesia, but without the colonial state formation process there
probably would not have been an Indonesian state as we know it today at
all.) Senior policy-makers, including Suharto himself, saw free market
capitalism as a good opportunity to favor their immediate families and
close business associates. But more broadly, economic growth was viewed as
necessary because the neighbouring countries around Indones
ia realized rapid economic growth. Should Indonesia fall behind, then this
would
make it vulnerable to external threats and internal insurrections.
Recent events in the spring and summer of 1998, after this book had been
published, confirm these suspicions. But Anne Booth goes one step further
and compares the authoritarian growth-oriented state with other
autoritarian developmental states such as Meiji Japan, Franco’s Spain,
and South Korea under Park Chung Hee. The history of these three
countries ‘would suggest that the forces of economic growth, once
unleashed, will inevitably lead to demands for a stronger legal and
constitutional framework which guarantees a broad range of civil liberties,
including a stronger regime of property rights. In Indonesia, too, it is
inevitable that economic growth will create such demands, which the
political system will then have to accomodate.’ … How the government
responds to these challenges will determine not just Indonesia’s
economic future in the new millenium, but its very survival as a
nation’ (p. 336).
These ominous words aptly describe a process that has been underway,
gaining speed after the KRISMON (monetary crisis in its Indonesian
acronym) and Suharto’s stepping down, and which will draw the world’s
attention to Indonesia for the next few years. It seems that a new
‘decolonization’ has just begun, and anyone who wants to put it in
perspective is recommended to read this book.
Jeroen Touwen
L. Jeroen Touwen is post-doc research fellow at the Historical Institute of
Leiden University. He is the author of Extremes in the Archipelago. Trade
and Economic Development in the Outer Islands of Indonesia, 1900-1942
(Leiden: KITLV Press, forthcoming in 1999).
Subject(s): | Economic Development, Growth, and Aggregate Productivity |
---|---|
Geographic Area(s): | Asia |
Time Period(s): | General or Comparative |