Published by EH.NET (May 2002)
Gunther Peck, Reinventing Free Labor: Padrones and Immigrant Workers in the
North American West, 1880-1930. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2000. xii + 293 pp. $55.00 (cloth), ISBN: 0-521-64160-8;
$20.00 (paper), ISBN: 0-521-77819-0.
Reviewed for EH.NET by Joshua L. Rosenbloom, University of Kansas, Department
Transient workers were an essential element in the development of the American
West in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries. They helped build
and maintain railroad lines, operate mines, harvest crops, and perform myriad
other physically demanding seasonal or temporary jobs. Where there were migrant
workers there were almost inevitably padrones. The padrone combined the
services of labor agent — matching workers with jobs — with numerous other
activities such as provisioning the workers, housing them, and acting as their
financial agent to transfer savings back to family members at home.
In this book Gunther Peck traces the history of the padrone and the transient
workers he served through an in-depth examination of the activities of three
individuals: Antonio Cordasco, who supplied Italian laborers to the Canadian
Pacific Railroad; Leon Skliris, who supplied Greek laborers to mining and
railroad projects in Utah; and Roman Gonzalez, who operated a labor agency in
El Paso, Texas that served primarily Mexican immigrant job-seekers. Peck
organizes his account in two parts, each three chapters long. In the first part
he develops a picture of how each of the padrones he studies operated, tracing
the development of their business, exploring their relationship to the
employers they supplied, and describing their responses to the legal
restrictions adopted in this period to control perceived and actual abuses of
the padrone system. In the second part of the book he shifts his focus to the
transient workers, exploring their motivations, the communities that they
built, and the ways in which they expressed grievances regarding their
treatment by the padrones.
Peck begins his account with a consideration of the origins and meaning of the
term padrone. Despite the widespread use of this term by contemporary social
reformers, its origins and meaning remained, as Peck shows, somewhat clouded.
Contemporaries viewed the padrone’s role as an archaic transplant from Europe,
but the term had very different connotations in Europe — applying to the
employment relationship between land-owners and their workers. The American
padrone was a very different figure who emerged in response to the distinctive
characteristics of scarce labor and isolated and temporary employment
opportunities that characterized the American West.
Peck then details the operation of the three padrones who are the focus of his
study. In the second half of Chapter 1 he introduces each through a brief
biography tracing the routes they followed from immigrant worker to padrone,
and detailing their fluctuating fortunes as labor market intermediaries. In
Chapter 2 he develops a more detailed picture of their operations concentrating
on the relationships that the padrones forged with the employers they served.
In the absence of well-developed personnel departments large corporations came
to rely on padrones to perform many of the personnel functions that would be
internalized in the 1920s. As Peck documents, the padrones’ comparative
advantage in locating, organizing, and mobilizing workers was what made their
services essential to the companies they served.
To contemporary social reformers, as to many historians, padrones appeared to
be coercive figures taking advantage of the ignorance of the workers whom they
served to abuse and exploit them. This perception led during the late
nineteenth century to a series of legislative efforts to prohibit these abuses
and regulate the operations of labor market intermediaries. In Chapter 3 Peck
describes these attempts to use the legal system to rein in padrone operations.
His account illustrates the tension in the legal system between freedom of
contract on the one hand, and the desire of the reformers to prohibit workers
from entering into agreements that the reformers perceived as unfair.
Ultimately, though, the chief obstacle to these regulatory efforts appears to
have been that no matter how unequal the division of the gains may have been,
the job-seekers and employers who dealt with the padrones found their services
indispensable in the prevailing labor market conditions of the time.
Beginning in Chapter 4, Peck shifts his focus to the immigrant workers who were
the padrones’ clients. Chapter 4 examines the motivations of the immigrants,
and the obligations and connections that linked them to their homes in Europe
and Mexico. Although Peck introduces new material here, much of what he
describes will be familiar to those acquainted with the general outlines of
late nineteenth-century migration patterns. Chapter 5 considers how transient
workers created communities despite their geographic mobility, and describes
the conflicts that emerged between the more sedentary middle class immigrant
communities and the transient laborers. Padrones occupied an at-times
uncomfortable middle ground between these two groups. By virtue of their
economic success they could claim membership in the more stable community of
settled immigrants. But their work created a community of interest and identity
with the mobile workers whom they provided with employment.
Chapter 6 takes up the issue of worker resistance to padrones. In most cases
transient workers had little leverage with which to bargain with the padrones
or their employers: they were far from home, often did not speak English, and
knew little about alternative employment opportunities. Moreover, they could be
easily replaced by other transient laborers. There was thus little room to
negotiate, and “exit” was the most common method of expressing dissatisfaction
with their working conditions. In a few instances workers sought legal remedies
through the courts, but as Peck acknowledges, such efforts were relatively
uncommon. Occasionally immigrant workers made common cause with labor unions
and used strikes to seek better working conditions. But, as in the case of the
Greek workers who joined the Western Federation of Miners in striking against
the Utah Copper Company in 1912, an event that Peck describes in some detail,
these efforts were mostly unsuccessful, foundering on the availability of
strikebreakers brought in by padrones.
By the 1930s the era of the padrone had ended. Labor agents continued to
operate, but these agents “rarely exercised” in Peck’s words, “the kind of
cultural and political power over the lives of immigrant workers that Cordasco
and Skliris briefly wielded” (p. 229). By this time, immigrants had learned
English, and had greater knowledge about employment opportunities that enabled
them to make do without the padrone’s services.
Scholars seeking to understand how labor markets worked in the era between the
Civil War and World War I will find a wealth of valuable information in this
book. Peck has carefully documented what Cordasco, Skliris, and Gonzalez did in
their role as labor market intermediaries and how they did it. But the
conceptual framework that Peck employs to organize this information is
frustratingly incomplete. In his introduction, Peck situates the book at the
intersection of immigration, western, labor, and legal history. Notably missing
from this list — and from the book — is the perspective of economic history.
Given the important place of labor markets in the narrative this omission is
To economists, market transactions are, by definition, mutually beneficial, and
Peck presents a great deal of evidence to suggest that both workers and
employers who contracted with padrones did so because they viewed these
transactions as superior to the available alternatives. There is no question
that in many instances padrones were able to exploit the relative ignorance of
immigrant workers to capture a large share of the gains from mobilizing labor.
But it is equally true that these workers required the services the padrone
supplied if they were to be able to take advantage of the opportunities
presented by the labor scarcity of the American West. Indeed, Peck documents
that the Mexican-American padrones, whose clients were closest to home, and the
best informed about employment opportunities, were the least able to take
advantage of the workers with whom they dealt. By focusing exclusively on what
he characterizes as the “coercive” nature of labor relations, Peck’s account
obscures rather than clarifies the meaning of the interactions that he
Joshua L. Rosenbloom is Professor of Economics at the University of Kansas,
and a Research Associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research. His
recent publications include Looking for Work, Searching for Workers:
American Labor Markets during Industrialization (Cambridge University