Author(s): | Hansen, Ejvind Damsgaard |
---|---|
Reviewer(s): | Reis, Jaime |
Published by EH.NET (September 2002)
Ejvind Damsgaard Hansen, European Economic History: From Mercantilism to
Maastricht and Beyond. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press, 2001.
528 pp. ?34, $54, *56 (hardcover), ISBN: 87-630-0017-2.
Reviewed for EH.NET by Jaime Reis, Institute for Social Sciences, University of
Lisbon.
This is an ambitious book. It seeks no less than to compress all the variety
of the last five hundred years of Europe’s economic experience (including two
preliminary chapters that cover the period 500-1500 AD) into roughly five
hundred pages. Even allowing for the fact that it claims to be no more than a
college textbook aimed at an audience of mostly students of Business
Administration, this is still no mean feat. Indeed, some might argue that the
requirements posed by such a specification are even more daunting than those
for the normal academic monograph. Be that as it may, the task E. Damsgaard
Hansen has set himself is not much less than encyclopedic. It requires an
immense and diverse fund of personal scholarship, a masterful capacity for
synthesis and an ability to separate the essential from the accessory to a
degree that only a tiny minority is fortunate enough to possess. Nevertheless,
this is definitely a brave and meritorious effort, which will doubtless find
its public and will serve it well, but it does not match the exacting standards
of this most demanding of genres. Probably, if for no other reason, this is why
there are so few broad scope textbooks on the economic history of single
continents and why even fewer readily come to mind.
The book is divided into six parts, each of them comprising between three and
five chapters. Most of these in turn are divided into two parts, the first
advancing an overview, and the second providing country-based narratives
showing how local lines of development gradually shaped the emergence of the
national differences that are so characteristic of Europe. This is a useful
expository device, not the least because it leads to a serious effort being
made throughout the book not to confine these national narratives to the major
powers of Europe, but to include the Low Countries, Scandinavia, Italy and the
Iberian Peninsula, as well. On the other hand, on occasions one wishes that the
time and space devoted to some of these inevitably perfunctory national
accounts (e.g. just over a page for Belgium and the Netherlands between 1875
and 1914) were dedicated to a stronger development of the chapter overviews and
to a more intense and explicit comparative effort. Students might even enjoy
this more and it would certainly be more beneficial to them.
The first of the six parts takes the reader briefly through the first thousand
years after the fall of Rome and then, more slowly up to the mid eighteenth
century and the onset of industrialization. The main thrust here is the
circumstances which made the Industrial Revolution possible, in other words
that fostered the technological breakthrough underpinning the emergence of mass
production and distribution. The talk is of the growth of food surpluses, the
development of markets and long distance trade, the establishment of
institutions favorable to complex but stable economic relationships, and the
rise of a moderately comfortable standard of living for a considerable part of
the population. One may note with approval already here the accent, inspired by
the New Institutional Economics, placed on political and institutional
development as a major influence on the course of economic change, and which
grows understandably stronger and stronger as one moves through the text
towards the end of the twentieth century. Whether, however, this justifies the
pre-eminence accorded to mercantilism, considered here as the state
building ideology of early modern Europe, putting it in the subtitle of the
book (along with Maastricht!) and giving it five pages of text as opposed to
one for the modern textile industry or the steam engine and a half for the iron
industry, seems rather more debatable.
The tempo increases with parts 2 and 3, which cover the next two hundred years
down to the Second World War. Part 2 recounts the gathering speed of
technological progress, the uneven spread of industrialization up to 1914, and
the reduction of the national state’s role in the economy, including the
shrinkage of the importance of policy. Although some attention is paid to the
“internationalization” of economic life, this is restricted to topics such as
the transmission across borders of new technologies, the hastening of
communications and the increasing export of capital by core countries. There is
no mention, however, of the recent and important debate on late nineteenth
century globalization and convergence. For a book which makes a laudable effort
to show how history can illuminate present-day events, it is not a little
surprising that nothing is said either about this, about mass migration, or
about the role of human capital in explaining national differences in
macroeconomic performance. Likewise, though the history of modern steam-powered
transport gets suitable consideration, readers will not learn anything here
about an old but no less important controversy concerning the economic impact
of railways and the use that was made in it of the concept of “social savings.”
In part 3, the “second European thirty years war” (1914-45) is presented as an
altogether “bad” experience for Europeans. The silver lining, however, is that
at least it served to provide the lessons on which the far more successful
policies of the second half of the century were founded. Otherwise, it was a
time of bungling, crisis and outright destructive war. A fairly conventional
gloomy picture of the era is thus retailed, but although with a concentration
on the disastrous nature of most policies, the narrative never omits to explain
that behind them there were reasons (even if not always reason) and not simply
whims. This is a valuable corrective for students who may be tempted to shun
the past when seeking to understand why governments make the decisions in
economic matters that they do.
This book finally comes into its own in its second half. This is where it deals
with post-war reconstruction, the subsequent ups and downs of the advanced
western economies, and the tortuous but apparently successful progress of the
process of integration of the European nation states. The narrative now becomes
informative and well structured, the essential themes emerge with clarity, and
the heavily intertwined relations among politics, policy and economics make
sense. A number of technical concepts, e.g. federalism, functionalism,
multilateralism, which are probably new or obscure to the target audience, are
introduced in a helpful manner. The evolution of institutions with complex
international roles, such as GATT, the IMF or the OEEC/OECD is rendered
accessible to the less informed reader without sacrificing their respective
histories too much. It seems safe to say that a beginner who studies parts 4, 5
and 6 properly ought to come away with a fair and balanced understanding of
this period’s major events and trends. This is still not, however, a proper
economic history of these decades. There is still too much here about
politics and policy and too little economic analysis, for instance, of the
Golden Age and its not-so-golden sequel after 1973. An excellent and burgeoning
literature is available for correcting the imbalance and could be harnessed to
this end. This would make this textbook as useful to the student reader as is
the often illuminating account it presents of Europe’s long term evolution
towards integration in the twentieth century.
Jaime Reis is currently Senior Research Director at the Institute for Social
Sciences of Lisbon University. Recently he published “How Poor Was the
Periphery before 1850? The Mediterranean versus Scandinavia” in Jeffrey
Williamson and Sevket Pamuk, editors, The Mediterranean Response to
Globalization before 1950 (Routledge).
Subject(s): | Economywide Country Studies and Comparative History |
---|---|
Geographic Area(s): | Europe |
Time Period(s): | 20th Century: WWII and post-WWII |