Samuel Bostaph wrote: > "Intended order" is important at the micro level in > economic organization. At the economy level, all it has > produced historically is misery for the general > population--and for the reasons that Mises and Hayek > outlined in the 1920s and 30s. At this point I would contend the conversation has drifted from history of thought to ideological assertion. Perhaps a discussion of Hobbes is in order? Cheers, Alan Isaac