Sharpe on Honeyman, _Child Workers in England, 1780-1820: Parish Apprentices and the Making of the Early Industrial Labour Force_
Book Reviews in Economic and Business History
eh.net-review at eh.net
Mon Oct 6 14:36:15 EDT 2008
Published by EH.NET (October 2008)
Katrina Honeyman, _Child Workers in England, 1780-1820: Parish
Apprentices and the Making of the Early Industrial Labour Force_.
Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007. xiii + 340 pp. $100/£60 (hardcover), ISBN:
978-0-7546-6272-3.
Reviewed for EH.NET by Pamela Sharpe, School of History and Classics,
University of Tasmania,
Child laborers are the iconic figures of the evils of Industrial
Revolution. The purpose of this book -- by one of economic history’s
most seasoned practitioners -- is to unveil the real story. Despite the
broad main title, the subjects of the book are not all child workers but
those children who went to work in mills and factories under schemes
developed by their local parishes. Effectively this was an extension of
the pauper apprenticeship scheme that, by 1780, when Honeyman’s story
starts, had been operating for well over two hundred years. It had
placed many tens of thousands of English children into the homes of
their more wealthy counterparts where they were given some training
(although often we cannot be sure what this amounted to beyond the
menial aspects of husbandry or housewifery), promised some clothing and
given a roof over their heads until their indentures expired.
Honeyman subjects the evidence about the first generation of child
factory workers to extremely detailed examination. It becomes clear that
the placing of these children involved negotiation on both sides -- both
by the parish officials and overseers and by the employers. Some
traveled large distances, from London parishes or southern rural places
that were feeling the burden of overpopulation to the industrializing
north, but there was a more numerically significant movement of children
over short distances. Factory owners -- some setting up in areas with
access to water power or other necessary natural resources -- could
expect to assemble a small band of local children from within a few
miles of their mills and factories. In this way, Honeyman convincingly
argues, child labor was a ‘vital kick start’ to enterprises that
otherwise would not have ever gotten off the ground.
On detailed examination the children’s jobs -- and these were rarely
children under seven -- were less menial and perhaps less arduous than
has been thought. After some initial training, children became
independent workers responsible for their own machines and with the
dexterity to piece together threads. In the same way that modern
children take to technology more rapidly than their parents, it can be
suggested (though this is not a point that Honeyman dwells on) that
children’s adaptability -- with no need to “unlearn” old methods of
production -- must have been an enormous advantage. Employers specified
whether they preferred boys or girls or would take either. Honeyman
argues that they developed a gendered work identity in this way. These
children certainly received some training in how to fit into the new
environment of the factory as a useful worker. There were markedly
different experiences of exploitation. While some children ran away,
others stayed on as mill workers beyond the time of the expiry of their
indentures.
An area that has not to this reviewer’s knowledge been systematically
explored previously is the extent to which the settlement parishes of
the factory children were involved in the placement. Honeyman devises a
range of measures to show how parish officials had communicated with or
visited the mills or factories before placing children and remained in
contact with their employers when the children were working there. A
wealthy London parish, St James’s, Piccadilly was very early to send
children to northern industrialists and remained involved in the schemes
for the years to follow. As a result, the historian can turn up a paper
trail, not unlike that generated by a contemporary fostering or adoption
arrangement. An area that Honeyman does not investigate is the
settlement implications of the placements. Presumably many of the
children took on new settlements in their new workplaces. For many, the
negotiations between parish official and industrialist meant their
transition from ploughboy to mule spinner or from female servant to
drawer or rover.
This is a meticulously researched and very balanced investigation. It is
the work of a very experienced economic historian. It is Katrina
Honeyman’s seventh book. She is Professor of Economic and Social History
at the University of Leeds and has worked in both the History department
and Business School in Leeds. Her reputation has been built on her work
in gender history, in the history of textiles and clothing and in
producing clear and accessible textbooks about the process of
industrialization.
The overall findings of this book are more optimistic than many other
accounts of child labor in factories. It is probable that the
paternalistic concerns of some southern parishes and institutions such
as the Foundling Hospital made a material difference to the lives of
these children that was lost a generation later. By the 1840s children
were employed in mines and factories in free market situations that were
widely investigated in Parliamentary commissions. By then the types of
sweated labor that emanated from partial mechanization of productive
processes took full effect. And, following the Poor Law Act of 1834,
there were no poor law officials to monitor the progress of their young
charges. Factory work was no longer novel and interesting and the cheap
and adaptable aspects of child labor had become its distinguishing
advantage.
Pamela Sharpe is Professor of History in the School of History and
Classics, at the University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia. She was
previously a Research Fellow at the University of Western Australia and
Lecturer in Social and Economic History at the University of Bristol.
She is currently editing a book about living arrangements of the poor in
long eighteenth century England (to be published by Palgrave in 2009)
and compiling a study of an outback mining community.
Copyright (c) 2008 by EH.Net. All rights reserved. This work may be
copied for non-profit educational uses if proper credit is given to the
author and the list. For other permission, please contact the EH.Net
Administrator (administrator at eh.net; Telephone: 513-529-2229). Published
by EH.Net (October 2008). All EH.Net reviews are archived at
http://www.eh.net/BookReview.
More information about the EH.Net-Review
mailing list