D'Amico on Lanaro, ed.,
_At the Centre of the Old World: Trade and Manufacturing in Venice
and the Venetian Mainland, 1400-1800_
eh.net-review at eh.net
eh.net-review at eh.net
Sun Jul 22 21:34:42 EDT 2007
Published by EH.NET (July 2007)
Paola Lanaro, editor, _At the Centre of the Old World: Trade and
Manufacturing in Venice and the Venetian Mainland, 1400-1800_.
Toronto: Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies, 2006. 412
pp. $32 (paperback), ISBN: 978-0-7727-2031-3.
Reviewed for EH.NET by Stefano D'Amico, Department of History, Texas
Tech University.
The eleven essays in this volume, edited by Paola Lanaro, Professor
of History at the Ca' Foscari University of Venice, represent an
important contribution to our knowledge of the economy of the
Venetian State in the early modern period and, more generally, to the
debate on the Italian economic decline in the seventeenth century.
Traditionally, Venetian economic history focused on the capital city
and its prosperous trading activities. In the last two decades,
however, the argument advanced by Cessi and Luzzato that commercial
interests and the protectionist measures supported by the great
international merchants had hindered the development of urban
industries, has been questioned, and the role of the industrial
sector of the economy reevaluated. New studies have also shown the
importance of the economic development of the lesser cities of the
mainland and their proto-industrial districts. Following these lines,
_At the Centre of the Old World_ calls for a reexamination of the
economic history of Venice and Veneto from the fifteenth to the
eighteenth centuries, focusing on the interaction between the capital
city and its dominions, and their successful attempt to adjust to the
changing European economy.
The volume is divided into two parts, the first analyzes the economy
of Venice, and the second that of other centers and areas of the
mainland. Paola Lanaro's introductory essay very clearly and
effectively discusses the historiography on Venetian economic history
and the new directions of research. The analysis of the Venetian
economy is opened by an essay by Andrea Mozzato, who demonstrates
convincingly how wool manufacturing did not develop only in the
sixteenth century when commercial opportunities declined, but was
already prosperous in the previous century. Mozzato argues that the
industrial sector actually took advantage of Venice's commercial
power, which could easily provide raw materials and sell the finished
products on international markets. Marcello Della Valentina examines
the organization of the urban silk industry in the seventeenth and
eighteenth centuries, stressing a flexibility that allowed it to
adjust to the changing market and to remain competitive. Fewer high
quality cloths were woven and Lyons fabrics were copied and exported
to the East where Venice still enjoyed an undisputed supremacy. At
the same time, cheap female labor gradually replaced that of guild
workers. Although they were unable to innovate in terms of technology
and fashion, trade guilds never opposed the introduction of technical
innovations or foreign technicians and weavers and were able to adapt
to an evolving market.
Francesca Trivellato examines a similar flexibility in the Murano
glass industry which, facing competition in crystal glass by northern
European countries, moved to Venice and employed women in bead
manufacturing and immigrants from Friuli in the production of
small-size mirrors. Glass beads were shipped to the Levant and
Western Europe for re-export to the colonies, while mirror plates
were sold mainly to the Italian market. In a more general essay on
the industries of Venice in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries,
Walter Panciera argues that the urban economy was remarkably
resilient. In the eighteenth century, besides the glass industry, new
manufactures, like printing, chemistry and cotton, were able to
flourish. In the more traditional textile sector, silk replaced wool,
which did not disappear, but was simply transferred to the
Terraferma. Panciera stresses that, the economy of Venice cannot be
considered separately from the economy of the rest of the Veneto,
especially starting from the seventeenth century.
The first essay of the second section, by Edoardo Demo, examines the
urban textile industry of the Venetian mainland between the fifteenth
and seventeenth centuries. Demo effectively shows how this area
represented one of the most important European industrial regions
during this period. A growing sericulture counterbalanced the decline
of the wool industry, and the latter still flourished in Bergamo and
in many centers of the foothills area like Schio and Valdagno.
Francesco Vianello explains how the crisis of the 1590s led either to
the beginning of or to an acceleration of the processes of
territorial diversification and specialization for rural manufactures
in the area of Vicenza, Padova and Treviso. Carlo Marco Belfanti
focuses on hosiery manufacturing stressing its resilience and its
growing role in the textile market, while Giovanni Favero illustrates
the contribution to the regional economy of the new factories of fine
majolica in small and medium sized towns of the mainland, such as
Bassano, since the early eighteenth century.
Luca Mocarelli studies the case of Venetian Lombardy which, in the
seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, became one of the more lively
European economic districts. Bergamo and Brescia could count on their
privileged economic relations with both Venice and Milan and
developed important wool, iron, paper and silk manufactures. At the
end of the eighteenth century they produced 10 percent of Italian
thrown silk.
In the conclusion to the volume, Maurice Aymard stresses not only the
flexibility and adaptability of Venice to variations in demand,
products and techniques, but also the creation of a new economy for
the region, whose resources were used more effectively. The Venetian
case clearly illustrates how in pre-modern Europe "the growth of the
urban sector, and especially of the largest city, can no longer be
considered ... as the only indicator of the vitality of an economy"
(p. 369).
The eleven essays successfully synthesize the most recent trends in
the economic history of early modern Italy. They represent an
invitation to historians to continue the analysis of the countryside
and the rural industries, whose role -- especially after the
seventeenth century -- became essential; and at the same time, to
reevaluate the role of the urban economies and their ability to
adjust to the new trends due to a flexible productive organization
that was not always hindered by and in some cases even favored by the
presence of the guilds. As Francesca Trivellato writes in her essay,
the guilds "in the hands of capable entrepreneurs ... became
malleable tools of winning short- and medium-term economic
strategies" (p. 145).
However, more than in the importance of the single contributions, the
value of the volume lays in the successful attempt of providing for
the first time an analysis of the economy of a large and important
Italian region, and to study its development within the Italian and
European contexts. Hopefully other regional syntheses will soon
follow this model, allowing us to reach a better understanding of the
characteristics and transformations of the Italian economy in the
early modern period.
Stefano D'Amico is Associate Professor of History at Texas Tech
University. He is the author of a book and several articles on the
social and economic history of Milan in the sixteenth and seventeenth
centuries. He is currently working on a manuscript tentatively titled
_A City within the Empire: Spanish Milan, 1535-1706_.
Copyright (c) 2007 by EH.Net. All rights reserved. This work may be
copied for non-profit educational uses if proper credit is given to
the author and the list. For other permission, please contact the
EH.Net Administrator (administrator at eh.net; Telephone: 513-529-2229).
Published by EH.Net (July 2007). All EH.Net reviews are archived at
http://www.eh.net/BookReview.
More information about the EH.Net-Review
mailing list