EH.Net Mailing List Archive: EH.Net-Review

"Namorato on Waller, _Thurman Arnold: A Biography_ and Holl, _From Boardroom to the War Room: America's Corporate Liberals and FDR's Preparedness Program_

eh.net-review at eh.net (eh.net-review at eh.net)

Tue Nov 7 09:45:48 EST 2006

Published by EH.NET (November 2006)  
  
Spencer Weber Waller, _Thurman Arnold: A Biography_. New York: New   
York University Press, 2005. xi + 271 pp. $40 (cloth), ISBN:   
0-8147-9392-4.  
  
Richard E. Holl, _From Boardroom to the War Room: America's Corporate   
Liberals and FDR's Preparedness Program_. Rochester, NY: University   
of Rochester Press, 2005. x + 191 pp. $75 (cloth), ISBN:   
1-58046-192-1.  
  
Reviewed for EH.NET by Michael V. Namorato, Department of History,   
University of Mississippi.  
  
  
These studies by Spencer Waller and Richard Holl have a number of   
interesting commonalities: both discuss American business, both   
address the importance of the New Deal and Franklin D. Roosevelt's   
policies, and both analyze how business and the New Deal interacted.   
They differ primarily in their approaches to these distinct areas of   
concern. Where Waller writes a biography of Thurman Arnold who was a   
member of the Department of Justice in the late 1930s, Holl looks at   
how American corporate businessmen (or liberals, as he calls them)   
worked with the Roosevelt Administration. Even more interesting is   
how these very corporate liberals and Thurman Arnold perceived each   
other.  
  
Waller argues very forcefully that Thurman Arnold was a unique   
individual in so many ways. He was "in essence the decathlon champion   
of American law" (p. 2). He was a practitioner, a law school dean, a   
legal realist, author, New Dealer, creator and enforcer of modern   
anti-trust laws, a federal judge, a defender of free speech during   
the McCarthy era, and the founder of one of the most prominent law   
firms in Washington today. As a person, moreover, Waller paints a   
picture of this icon as one who liked to be funny, was not much of a   
father (but made up for it by being a better grandfather), and whose   
loyalty to his friends, such as Abe Fortas, never wavered.  
  
In reaching these conclusions, Waller meticulously studies Arnold's   
life -- beginning with his parents, childhood in Wyoming, education   
at Princeton, and law school at Harvard. An average student, Arnold   
developed his interests in writing and partying, although, by law   
school, he focused more and more on the work at hand. As a young   
lawyer, Arnold went to Chicago where he took on cases that seemed to   
be routine and not very challenging. When World War I broke out, he   
served in France after which he and his wife returned to Laramie to   
set up home and a law practice.  
  
Waller recounts details about Arnold's life as a small town   
politician and later dean of the West Virginia College of Law, which   
helped him to survive the Great Depression. From there, he went to   
the Yale Law School as a teacher. Waller spends a considerable amount   
of time discussing how Arnold became a "legal realist" at Yale. He   
also summarizes in detail Arnold's writings in such works as _The   
Symbols of Government_ and _The Folklore of Capitalism_. Undoubtedly,   
these exercises in teaching and writing helped prepare him for the   
later work he would do in the New Deal in the Anti-Trust Division of   
the Department of Justice.  
  
In Chapter 6, Waller recounts how Arnold got into the New Deal and   
worked on the enforcement of anti-trust laws, and how Franklin D.   
Roosevelt responded to what he had done. The author gives long,   
in-depth explanations of the cases that Arnold pursued -- which were   
won, lost, or had a long-term impact on American jurisprudence.   
Probably the most significant discussion in these sections recounts   
how Arnold perceived anti-trust as a means of preventing abuse of   
power in the business world. Relentless in promoting himself and his   
causes, Arnold continually lobbied for more staff, resources, and   
funds. Several cases would go on to become quite important in legal   
history such as the Alcoa, American Medical Association, and oil   
industry cases. Nevertheless, with his usefulness diminishing, Arnold   
left the New Deal to start a new life as a federal judge.  
  
His judgeship was quite unhappy and Arnold was relieved to get out of   
it and into opening a private practice, at first with Reed Miller.   
Later, of course, Arnold joined forces with Abe Fortas and Paul   
Porter. Together, they established one of the most prominent law   
firms in Washington. The remainder of the book studies how the firm   
grew, how it got involved in the McCarthy era witch hunt cases, and   
Arnold's work with Coca Cola and Fortas' relationship with Lyndon   
Johnson. By the 1960s, Arnold was an icon among lawyers in   
Washington, despite his outspoken views on Vietnam and other issues.   
On November 7, 1969, after telling his wife Frances that he was not   
sure he wanted to live any longer, he died peacefully.  
  
Richard Holl, unlike Waller, takes a different approach in his study   
of American business and the New Deal. Essentially, Holl looks at   
what he calls the "corporate liberals" of the American business   
world. These were visionary businessmen who sought to work with   
Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal instead of fighting against it. They   
saw cooperation with the government as a means of avoiding a stronger   
central state and as a way of re-creating industrial self-government.  
  
Holl makes the case that these corporate liberals were those   
businessmen in the 1920s who were very much in favor of welfare   
capitalism and trade associationism. They wanted to help workers,   
improve business's position in American society, and collaborate with   
the federal government. Specifically, Holl focuses on Henry Dennison,   
Gerard Swope, Marion Folsom, Edward Stettinius, William Knudsen,   
Donald Nelson, Averell Harriman, Owen Young, and a few others.  
  
Starting with the 1920s, Holl details how these corporate liberals   
tried to develop their own welfare capitalist plan in his their own   
companies and how the Great Depression forced them to retract their   
promises. However, Holl goes on to show that these corporate   
liberals, especially people like Stettinius, Knudsen, and Nelson,   
worked with Franklin Roosevelt in his New Deal, beginning with the   
National Recovery Administration, Social Security, and the Wagner   
Act. Holl argues forcefully that the BAC (Business Advisory Council)   
of the Department of Commerce sustained the corporate liberals'   
presence within the Roosevelt Administration. Even though most   
historians talk about the anti-Roosevelt business position by   
1937-38, Holl points out that there were still a number of corporate   
liberals who supported the president. With Harry Hopkins in the   
Commerce Department, these corporate liberals like Willard Thorp,   
Edward Noble, and Robert Wood worked with the secretary to see how   
businessmen could foster New Deal objectives as, for example, with   
the Bureau of Industrial Economics.  
  
But, it was really in the preparedness area that the corporate   
liberals made their mark. Holl meticulously relates how the United   
States was unprepared for World War II. Roosevelt and the corporate   
liberals knew it and realized that something had to be done to   
rectify this dangerous situation. Neither Roosevelt nor the corporate   
liberals wanted a state-centered answer like the "all-outers" New   
Dealers, such as Harold Ickes. Instead, the president and his   
business supporters called for and got cooperation.  
  
This is where Holl contributes his most original ideas. Using   
Stettinius, Knudsen, and Nelson as backdrops, Holl studies how the   
War Resources Board, the National Defense Advisory Commission, and   
the Office of Production Management went about helping the United   
States prepare itself for war by bringing the military and business   
together, by having "educational orders" filled out by companies that   
would have to produce military supplies, by having these influential   
businessmen direct the military and civilian authorities along   
workable paths for meeting wartime demands, and by giving the   
president leeway to develop and foster cooperation between business   
and government. In the end, it all worked in the sense that the   
corporate liberals kept the extreme radical New Dealers and extreme   
anti-New Deal businessmen from dominating war preparations.  
  
How does one assess these two works on the New Deal? In many ways   
Waller's book is a biography about a lawyer which is written by a   
lawyer. This is not meant in any way to demean or detract from the   
study. Waller has written a good work on an individual who has not   
received as much attention as he deserves. It should also be pointed   
out, however, that there are a few shortcomings in this work. The   
author spends too much time summarizing Arnold's briefs and his   
writings. He also tends to give Arnold more importance than he might   
have had. And, his portrayal of Arnold as an individual is sometimes   
lost in the maze of all the "legalese" that the reader has to   
confront.  
  
On the other hand, it is clear that Holl has done an extensive amount   
of research on the corporate liberals and wartime agencies. His   
research is solid, his ideas are definitely interesting, and his   
writing style is fine. But, again as in the case of Waller, Holl has   
a couple of shortcomings. The most important weakness is that he   
tends to re-iterate much of what others have said about businessmen,   
especially Ellis Hawley. What makes Holl's work original, though, is   
that he focuses more on the individual corporate executives. Here,   
his contribution is, indeed, significant.  
  
In closing, both Waller's biography of Thurman Arnold and Holl's   
study of America's corporate liberals are solid examples of   
old-fashioned, good historical research and analysis. Both have   
offered interesting perspectives on their subjects and both have   
given us some original ideas to look at and consider when it comes to   
American business, the New Deal, and the anti-trust laws.  
  
  
Michael V. Namorato, Professor of History at the University of   
Mississippi, specializes in the Great Depression-New Deal era. He is   
currently working with two co-authors on a political, economic study   
of child welfare in Mississippi.  
  
Copyright (c) 2006 by EH.Net. All rights reserved. This work may be   
copied for non-profit educational uses if proper credit is given to   
the author and the list. For other permission, please contact the   
EH.Net Administrator (administrator at eh.net; Telephone: 513-529-2229).   
Published by EH.Net (November 2006). All EH.Net reviews are archived   
at http://www.eh.net/BookReview.